Another not-new post; from when I signed up for Pinboard, about a month ago.
I've never actually paid for online services. I don't really see the need to; if there's something that looks nifty, I'll usually figure out a way to do that thing myself. I'm really hoping Pinboard is going to be worth it. Not that the money is actually a big deal, or even, like, a little deal. $25 is nothing, especially spread over a year, and especially taking into account how much more productive I'll hopefully be without spending hours every week just trying to access bookmarks (some of which I actually do need).
So this'll be the first test. What implementation of Markdown are we using, here? Let's find out.
(You didn't need to see all that. I just checked with the full syntax references from a few different kinds of md. Looks like we're using the original, here. Which is fine, of course, though I wouldn't've said no to some nice table support.)
I didn't even know this had notes, though. So that's just a bonus. I'll have to check the API docs in a minute and see if there's an easy way to grab them; eventually I'd like to move to syndicating everything out rather than in, but for the moment having a way to post on one service and it be automatically cross-posted to equivalents is pretty basic, and essential in any public (or optionally-public) (micro)blogging thingamajig.
That's really not super important, though. The real question is, how's the full-text search? That's why I'm here. Because I have just about 80,000 bookmarks. I'm fairly certain only about 20,000 of them are real bookmarks, and Chromium's totally screwed-up way of syncing left me with an absurd amount of duplicates. There's no way I can delete them all, though. Using an actual in-browser bookmark manager isn't an option, obviously--browsers aren't database tools, they just have to deal with databases sometimes--and some really great addons/extensions that've come in handy in the past are basically worthless once your numbers reach around 5k. Doing it manually would be totally fine except it's not, apparently. Have you ever tried to open a really really really large text file and work with it? If you're a Microsoft user, you don't even need to think about that--of course not! Notepad can only handle a few megs or something, right? I've managed to export my bookmarks a few times over the past couple of weeks and get them up in one editor or another to try to fix things. This new laptop was promising (no, I didn't get it just to work with my bookmarks). Four times the RAM and twice the processing power? Hells yes, thought I! But hells no, thought my computer. I'm not any good with sed, awk, or regular expressions; I'm chained to screen editors. I'm sure there's some ridiculous keyboard sequence out there that could help me. I'm sure I could learn a language that seems to be mostly based on parentheses, masochism, and egos just to be able to do anything. But I already have an operating system, so I don't really need a new text editor, thanks. I know the Vimfolks probably have a plugin for that... but generally speaking I like my editors to be smaller than full-featured Webkit web browsers (Vim: ~7=840k SLOC, Qutebrowser: ~32k, source ). Oh, and I don't know any query languages, because no thanks. SO...
This little test of a note actually took a really long time to write because: - I had to look some things up - I got distracted - Managing dotfiles so I can just handle them in git for all machines - People who use Emacs apparently don't understand how sane people use the web - Exporting bookmarks And with that in mind, I'mma (manually) cross-post this to Tumblr, and then hopefully upload about an 80MB HTML file to Pinboard for processing. Oh geez.